data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89547/89547e09267d0bcf46128f69e0adbf8e4ba01079" alt="3 Key Leadership Lessons from the 10th Mountain’s Homestake Fiasco 3 Key Leadership Lessons from the 10th Mountain’s Homestake Fiasco"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89547/89547e09267d0bcf46128f69e0adbf8e4ba01079" alt="3 Key Leadership Lessons from the 10th Mountain’s Homestake Fiasco 3 Key Leadership Lessons from the 10th Mountain’s Homestake Fiasco"
As Coloradans living in the Rockies, we value the heritage of the 10th Mountain Division, look to their history for lessons in outdoor survival, cherish exploring the huts they built. We perceive 10th Mountain as a brand of excellence, legendary in the ski and snowboard industry. As leaders, we look to skill sets acquired through operating in the mountain environment for unique leadership lessons.
In late February, 1943, the 10th Mountain Division realized that they would not be a defensive force for North America as originally thought. The threat of invasion had been eliminated as Germany and Japan had both been contained. The mission of the 10th would be to fight and regain ground, likely in Europe. But there was one major issue: the 10th had never done a major maneuver, and as the first specialized division in the US Army, its equipment, protocols and even tactics had not been tested in the field.
With that knowledge, a full battalion set out the top of Tennessee Pass to camp at Homestake Lake. The maneuvers that occurred there over the next week became known as “The Homestake Fiasco”.
Numerous mistakes were made and problems plagued the battalion at Homestake: some troops were undertrained, not knowing basic ski and survival techniques. The tents they had were not insulated enough for the -30 F temperatures at night. Frostbite and elevation sickness were rampant. The oppositional force never deployed for maneuvers because too many of the training forces were unable to operate. In the end, at least one officer was relieved of his leadership role.
How does a group recover from something like that? Research on resilience suggests one of the things that the men of the 10th did is an essential practice in a resilient reaction to bad events. They framed it well.
The power of how we perceive a failure like the Homestake Fiasco is so powerful that resilience researcher George Bonanno of Teacher’s College in New York prefers to call them “PTEs” – potentially traumatic events. Bonanno’s research has shown that a key aspect of resilient behavior is to interpret an event as a learning opportunity instead of as a trauma or failure.
One of the 10th’s potential failures that they turned into a learning experience was their tents. It snowed inside the tents because of breath condensation building up and freezing. This “snow” would fall and get the soldiers’ down sleeping bags wet, reducing their utility. Instead of throwing up their arms in defeat, the soldiers looked to some of the experienced mountaineers and began making the use of snow caves, which managed moisture well, a standard operating procedure.
The 10th mountain division didn’t look at Homestake as a trauma, but as a learning experience. While it was given that name by some involved, the lessons learned carried many of the green recruits forward into their capability to thrive and fight on mountains. Many of the principles learned in at Homestake were directly used in the next major training event, the Trooper Traverse the following February. The legacy continues to live through Vail Centre’s Sempre Avanti program coming up this year, April 6-8, where a portion of the traverse is used to strengthen your leadership self-knowledge under pressure.
So what’s a leader to do? The soldiers of the 10th had an advantage where Homestake was explicitly a learning experience. How do we avoid the trap of labelling an event a failure instead of learning? The practice of learned optimism has an answer.
When psychologist Martin Seligman put forward the idea of learned optimism, a key leadership lesson, he found that individuals who are more likely to see failures instead of learning opportunities have three generalizations that they make about events: Me, Always and Everything.
Often it’s not easy for us to see a traumatic event as a learning experience instead of trauma. Failing at work, arguing with a partner, or hurting our bodies are quickly and easily seen as a bad experience, not learning. But the example of the 10th and the research on resilience tells us that we should look at the experience with an optimistic eye.
Have you or your company experienced a potentially traumatic event that helped you grow? Share it in the comments below; you’ll inspire us and the other readers.
Do you have an interest in developing your leadership skills further by learning from the 10th Mountain Division, and while in the mountains? Explore the Sempre Avanti destination program.